×
Oct 5, 2011 · Make it parallel. Divide the array in chunks and search in parallel. The complexity will be O(n) but running time will be much less.
People also ask
Mar 18, 2013 · Yes, if the array is unsorted and that's all you know about its structure then the fastest way to search for an element is to consider every ...
Missing: 7656791/ | Show results with:7656791/
Sep 1, 2016 · If you need to search through the array multiple times, then performing a binary search is the correct answer - but you must first sort the ...
Missing: 7656791/ | Show results with:7656791/
Jul 11, 2016 · The problem is with b=occ(p+pivot,dim-pivot,X); when pivot is 0. i.e. when dim is 1. the next function call becomes occ(p,1,X); This again ...
Missing: 7656791/ | Show results with:7656791/
Mar 30, 2010 · I understand that finding anything in an unsorted array is a O(n) problem. But, is this true if the array contains duplicate elements as well ?
Missing: 7656791/ | Show results with:7656791/
Apr 9, 2013 · It's true, a binary search will not work on an unsorted array; however, you'd first have to sort the array to perform the binary search. At ...
Missing: 7656791/ | Show results with:7656791/
Dec 27, 2015 · Store the values in a temporary array, sort them, and then apply binary search. If the element is found, return its position in the temporary ...
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 7 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.